🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it feels like it’s time for a rethink. As time has passed, an celebration that was initiated as a celebration and reminder of the past, cultural identity and bonds between international African diaspora communities, has taken on a commercial tone, broadening to incorporate functions where African descendants are remunerated to address white audiences about implicit prejudice and “allyship”. The 2020s Black Lives Matter protests generated a rise in the enterprise of showcasing anti-racist commitment. However, that period has concluded. The surge has reached its height, leaving a sort of hollowed out legacy of what promoting consciousness is for.

The History of Black History Observance

First commemorated in the America and its northern neighbor, Black History Month was established in 1962 as “Negro History Week” by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with a week of commemoration and observance in the February's second week. Black History Month evolved from this campaign and was formally inaugurated in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the North America in February, but also in autumn in the UK, the Federal Republic of Germany, Ireland and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The period has developed since its inception, giving reduced attention to the accounts of transatlantic enslavement and fights for racial justice, and increasingly on influential individuals of color in politics, culture, and activism, and extensively acknowledging the input Black people have made to shape the country. It is in schools where Black History Month is most commonly celebrated, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the method the celebration is celebrated is a manifestation of the current political situation. How it develops is a good lesson in how assimilation leads to weakening: the reshaping of Black History Month has stymied the point of it, which is to address systemic and institutional racism.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Little demonstrates how important it is to reevaluate Black History Month as much as the particular moment in which it takes place this year. In the UK, a resurgent right in the form of the Reform political group is ahead in surveys. In the recent season we saw the most significant ultra-conservative gathering in British history. the Conservative leader, the African descendant in charge of the right-wing political group, is a strong critic of the racial justice movement, and we are in a place where a legislator feels emboldened to state that the absence of Caucasian individuals in specific city neighborhoods is a reason for concern. Meanwhile, extreme conservative groups are surging in the European continent as a entirety.

In the United States, a massive attack against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been carried, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the highest courts of the country. A campaign to erase African American heritage and narrative from the historical documents is under way. One of the former president's initial presidential directives aimed at the museum of African American legacy, and the prestigious establishment, accusing them of a “concerted and widespread effort to alter the country's historical narrative” by portraying America “as fundamentally prejudiced”.

In this context, the observance symbolises how minimally it can be impactful if it is restricted to either dutiful corporate observances, or stripped of political content commemorations of former accomplishments, rather than addressing the situation of the current era. It also reveals how its limited duration means that it is detached from the wider consistent effort that is necessary. A university professor, a prof at University of Greenwich, articulated it most accurately when she expressed apprehension about the fleeting superficial actions of the celebration. “The issue with embracing a superficial method”, she commented, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month becomes a transient display rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Establishing how to alter, change and broaden initiatives for fair treatment and appreciation in such times of discouragement and concern is a challenging endeavor. There is a inclination to just do away with observances such as Black History Month completely, thinking they are inadequate for current needs, or are vestiges of an time that has been ineffective.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the complete comprehensive structure and legacy of racial movements – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, inclusion and equity efforts, and indeed, including corporate presentations – represent an foundation that a considerable labor has been invested in. It is there not only to deteriorate as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, deteriorates), but to be a living breathing thing.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month look like? To begin with, it would be not just one concentrated month: something that is dispersed throughout the annual calendar (as various establishments are already beginning to do), elements of its material (particularly around notable African descendants) integrated into school curriculums. It would also be a time that does not evade politics, and leaves space for individuals, particularly young people, to express their concerns and stories. What value has mere awareness of the bygone era when it fails to address the current situation of ultra-nationalist gatherings in the public spaces? Institutions who observe it should not be pacified with the non-confrontational words of hidden discrimination and awareness of minor insults, but faced with the dangers that impact society if opposition to discrimination is not approached earnestly. In short, Black History Month should be made contemporary, pressing, and responsive. It could be that an entire name rebrand is required – Black History is Now Month.